|
Home
CME Live Seminars
About the Program
Quick Order
Hotel Registration
Auto Rental
Accreditation
Cancellation Policy
Testimonials
CME Video DVD
CME Audio CD/MP3
Subscribe
Request Brochure
Hold Seat
Testing Online
Faculty
Resources
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
Live CME Seminars
Emergency Medicine CME |
|
|
by Michael A. Gibbs, M.D., F.A.C.E.P. - Tufts University School of Medicine; Professor of Emergency Medicine; Chief, Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center; Immediate Past President, Maine Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians, Portland, ME
and Andrew D. Perron, M.D., F.A.C.E.P., F.A.C.S.M. - Tufts University School of Medicine; Professor of Emergency Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine; Director, Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Maine Medical Center; Certificate of Added Qualifications in Sports Medicine, Portland, ME.
Learning Objectives
What do our past participants have to say?
Refer a Colleague to Our Website
|
|
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: Following this course, the participant should be able to appraise the epidemiology, demographics and common clinical presentations for the diseases and disorders discussed; construct an appropriate history, physical exam and laboratory evaluation to develop cost-effective and accurate diagnosis; manage as well as employ appropriate follow-up and/or specialty referral for the diseases and disorders presented. This activity is expected to result in improved competence in making appropriate diagnosis and providing effective treatment and referral or follow-up care with the overall goal of improving patient outcomes.
The emphasis will be on aligning physician behavior with current guidelines and evidence-based medicine, as indicated within each topic’s specific objectives. Emergency Medicine is a specialty that has a high rate of utilization and change in standards of care. It is often the point of entry for medical care; therefore, this course was designed to be of value to all practitioners at the level of a practicing physician in an effort to keep them abreast of current clinical practices in Emergency Medicine.
| | Day 1 |
Mastering Local and Regional Anesthesia. Pitfalls in Orthopedics. Wide-Complex Tachycardias: When is V-Tach Not V-Tach? Pericarditis and Myocarditis: How Can 2 Diseases Sound So Similar and Act So Differently? |
| Day 2 |
Minor Closed Head Injury: An Evidence-Based Approach. Low Back Pain in the ED: What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Don’t Know. Aortic Disasters. Abdominal Pain Case Studies. |
| Day 3 |
Cutting Edge Airway Management. Airway Rescue Strategies. ST-Segment Elevation: MI or Not MI. Acute Coronary Syndrome in the ED: So Many Drugs and So Little Time. |
| Day 4 |
PE and DVT in the Emergency Department. Thrombolysis for Stroke. Hypertension – Just the Facts! Turning Error into Opportunity. |
| Day 5 |
Trauma Case Studies. Essentials of Trauma Imaging. Early Goal Directed Therapy in Sepsis: Why All the Fuss? Community Acquired Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA): An Update.
|
|
|
Emergency Medicine: Practicing According to the Evidence
March 21-25, 2011
Location: Hyatt Regency Sarasota, Florida
| SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
| | Day 1 | Mastering Local and Regional Anesthesia - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| 1. | Appraise the pharmacology of local anesthetics.
| | 2. | Analyze recent controversies in local anesthetic techniques.
| | 3. | Determine and employ regional anesthetic techniques appropriate for the ED.
| | Pitfalls in Orthopedics - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Determine and assess high-risk scenarios in emergency orthopedics.
| | 2. | Differentiate severe true orthopedic emergencies.
| | 3. | Detect commonly missed/mis-managed orthopedic conditions, using a case-based approach.
| | Wide-Complex Tachycardias: When is V-Tach Not V-Tach? - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Analyze the possible etiologies and ECG appearance of wide complex tachycardias.
| | 2. | Discriminate ECG features of these rhythms that will help differentiate between ventricular tachycardia and other more benign etiologies.
| | 3. | Appraise evidence-based treatment of these dysrhythmias.
| | 4. | Assess the clinical significance of the underlying medical conditions that result in these dysrhythmias.
| | Pericarditis & Myocarditis: How Can 2 Diseases Sound So Similar & Act So Differently? - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Illustrate the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of these two entities.
| | 2. | Differentiate the potential pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of these diseases.
| | 3. | Analyze the commonalities and differences of these closely related diseases.
| | 4. | Recommend evidence-based work-up and treatment options for pericarditis and myocarditis.
|
| | Day 2 | Minor Closed Head Injury: An Evidence-Based Approach - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| 1. | Assess and relate the pathophysiology of minor closed head injury.
| | 2. | Appraise the literature as it pertains to minor closed head injury.
| | 3. | Recommend diagnostic algorithms appropriate for the evaluation and management of minor CHI in light of best-evidence available.
| | Low Back Pain in the ED: What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Don’t Know - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Apply an evidence-based approach to the evaluation of non-traumatic back pain.
| | 2. | Differentiate the “red flags” that should heighten the suspicion for serious pathology in the evaluation of back pain.
| | 3. | Assess and differentiate both effective as well as disproved therapies in the treatment of back pain.
| | 4. | Specify potential pitfalls in the treatment and disposition of low back pain.
| | Aortic Disasters - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Specify the pathophysiology and clinical presentations, and formulate ED management, of the following:
| a. | Abdominal aortic aneurysm,
| | b. | Traumatic aortic disruption,
| | c. | Essentials of aortic dissection.
|
| | Abdominal Pain Case Studies - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Develop an evidence-based approach to evaluation of the ED patient with abdominal pain.
| | 2. | Determine and avoid common pitfalls in the assessment of patients with abdominal pain.
| | 3. | Detect and assess high-risk scenarios related to patients with abdominal pain.
|
| | Day 3 | Cutting Edge Airway Management - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| 1. | Appraise the essentials of airway pharmacology.
| | 2. | Develop and integrate a fundamental approach to airway assessment.
| | 3. | Specify the technique of rapid sequence intubation.
| | Airway Rescue Strategies - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Appraise the epidemiology and differentiate risk factors associated with the failed airway in the ED.
| | 2. | Analyze and recommend contemporary airway rescue techniques.
| | 3. | Develop an algorithm for management of the failed airway.
| | ST-Segment Elevation: MI or Not MI - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Analyze the wide variety of clinical conditions that can result in ST elevation on the ECG.
| | 2. | Detect ECG findings that can aid the clinician in determining the significance of ST-elevation on an ECG.
| | 3. | Evaluate and employ possible adjuncts a clinician can use to further define the significance of ST-elevation on an ECG.
| | Acute Coronary Syndrome in the ED: So Many Drugs and So Little Time - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Analyze the scope of the problem of ACS in the ED.
| | 2. | Integrate the evidence-based treatment of ACS based on the latest applicable literature.
| | 3. | Relate the areas of controversy in the treatment of this disease entity.
| | 4. | Assess emerging therapies that may prove useful for the treatment of ACS in the ED.
| | 5. | Apply and integrate the updated ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
|
| | Day 4 | PE and DVT in the Emergency Department - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| 1. | Analyze the scope of the problem of thromboembolic disease in the ED.
| | 2. | Employ the latest diagnostic algorithms and adjuncts available to aid the clinician in the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease.
| | 3. | Appraise the evidence-based treatment of thromboembolic disease based on the latest applicable literature.
| | 4. | Assess the limitations of current diagnostic modalities for these diseases.
| | Thrombolysis for Stroke - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Analyze and integrate the principles and pathophysiology of stroke and stroke treatment.
| | 2. | Appraise the applicable medical literature that is available to the clinician.
| | 3. | Debate the performance of thrombolysis for stroke to this point in time.
| | 4. | Appraise the controversy in the medical literature regarding this therapy.
| | 5. | Determine emerging technologies and therapies that may prove useful for the treatment of stroke in the ED.
| | Hypertension – Just the Facts! - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Determine the emergency department "essentials" for the assessment of the patient with hypertension.
| | 2. | Develop a rational framework for the ED treatment of acute hypertension.
| | 3. | Integrate essentials of the current guidelines: "Prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure (JNC 7).”
| | Turning Error into Opportunity - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Specify the elements of the emergency care environment that predisposes the clinician to decision-making errors.
| | 2. | Develop and integrate cognitive strategies that reduce the likelihood of error.
| | 3. | Design and implement effective methods for reviewing, discussing and addressing medical errors.
|
| | Day 5 | Trauma Case Studies - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| 1. | Specify and apply critical issues in the evaluation and management of the injured patient using a case-based format.
| | 2. | Formulate the management imperatives of:
| a. | Blunt and penetrating traumatic arrest,
| | b. | Shock in the injured patient,
| | c. | Severe traumatic brain injury,
| | d. | Spinal trauma,
| | e. | Pelvic ring trauma,
| | f. | Aortic trauma.
|
| | 3. | Determine and avoid common pitfalls in the evaluation of the injured patient.
| | Essentials of Trauma Imaging - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Assess and determine which patients need imaging following trauma.
| | 2. | Recommend which imaging studies are most effective in diagnosing injury.
| | 3. | Employ evidence-based guidelines for:
| a. | Imaging of the cervical spine,
| | b. | Thoracic imaging,
| | c. | Imaging in blunt aortic injury,
| | d. | Interpretation of pelvic radiology,
| | e. | Indications and strengths/weaknesses of abdominal CT,
| | f. | Indications for CT imaging in minor brain injury.
|
| | Early Goal Directed Therapy in Sepsis: Why All the Fuss? - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Determine the pathophysiology of sepsis and the sepsis syndrome.
| | 2. | Evaluate the scope of the problem regarding effective management of sepsis in the ED.
| | 3. | Appraise the principles of early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of sepsis.
| | 4. | Assess the potential gains that can be realized, as well as the pitfalls to avoid, in the management of sepsis utilizing early goal directed therapy.
| | Community Acquired Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA): An Update - Upon completion of this session, the participant should be able to:
| | 1. | Assess risk factors for CA-MRSA infection.
| | 2. | Specify the best-evidence management of skin and soft-tissue infections in the era of drug resistance.
| | 3. | Assess both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management strategies for this disease entity.
| | 4. | Demonstrate familiarity with the latest treatment recommendations for CA-MRSA.
|
|
|